Category: Victories

BG Trial Team Named Law360 “Legal Lions of the Week” for Victory Against Johnson & Johnson

A Bailey Glasser trial team was chosen by preeminent legal publication Law360 as one of its “Legal Lions of the Week” following a major win against Johnson & Johnson after a two-week trial before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Houston.

As set forth in Law360:

Meanwhile, in Texas, the Coalition of Counsel for Justice for Talc Claimants is celebrating after a bankruptcy judge shot down Johnson & Johnson’s third attempt to use Chapter 11 to settle thousands of claims that its products caused cancer.

Judge Christopher M. Lopez tossed the roughly $9 billion bankruptcy deal on Monday, citing voting irregularities before J&J unit Red River Talc’s bankruptcy filing. In his decision, Judge Lopez said Red River misapplied its vote-counting procedures in an attempt to lock down a deal that would have used nonconsensual liability waivers to insulate itself, J&J and others from being held liable for talc claims.

The Coalition of Counsel for Justice for Talc Claimants is represented by Nicholas R. Lawson and Avi Moshenberg of Lawson & Moshenberg PLLC, Melanie L. Cyganowski, Adam C. Silverstein, Sunni P. Beville, David A. Castleman and Jennifer S. Feeney of Otterbourg PC, and Brian A. Glasser, Thomas B. Bennett, David L. Selby II, Jonathan Gold, Katherine E. Charonko and Elizabeth L. Stryker of Bailey & Glasser LLP.

Additional members of the firm’s litigation team included partner Joshua Hammack, and Of Counsel Michael Shenkman.

The case is In re: Red River Talc LLC, Case Number 4:24-bk-90505, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.

To learn more about this case, please visit this link.

BG Wins Dismissal of J&J’s Third Attempt To Dismiss Talc Claims in Bankruptcy

March 31, 2025: Today, a federal court dismissed the third attempt by Johnson & Johnson to create a mechanism to dispose of talc-related litigation claims outside the Constitutionally-guaranteed jury process. Johnson & Johnson has tried twice to use this “Texas Two-Step” legal maneuver and was unsuccessful, with both of those Chapter 11 cases dismissed as bad faith filings.

In this third unsuccessful attempt to discharge its liabilities in bankruptcy, Johnson & Johnson shopped for what it thought would be a more favorable forum for its third attempted bankruptcy – Texas. In February 2025, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Houston conducted a two-week trial to determine the validity of the claims, the process through which claimants were permitted to vote, and to hear the objections of the Coalition of Counsel for Justice for Talc Claimants, which included thousands of women injured by J&J’s talc products, some of whom died in the months before the matter was tried.

At the end of an exhaustive analysis of the record, and pursuant to a 57-page opinion, the federal court found that the totality of the record required dismissal. The record included prepetition voting and solicitation irregularities, an unreasonably short voting time for thousands of creditors, and that appointment of a trustee or conversion does not make sense in this case. The Court also noted that “There is no real company or jobs to save here. This case is about whether voters will accept a deal.”

The court’s decision stated: “While the Court’s decision is not an easy one, it is the right one.”

Co-lead trial counsel Brian Glasser stated: “Judge Lopez did the right thing and followed the law. His opinion will be sustained on appeal.”

The Coalition of Counsel for Justice for Talc Claims trial team was co-led by Bailey & Glasser founding partner Brian A. Glasser, Mass Torts Practice Group Leader David L. Selby, Electronically Stored Information Practice Group Leader Katherine E. Charonko, and litigator Elizabeth L. Stryker. Additional members of the BG team includes Bankruptcy Practice Group Leader Jonathan Gold, partners D. Todd Mathews and Joshua Hammack, and Of Counsels Thomas B. Bennett and Michael Shenkman.

Bailey Glasser’s 2024 Year in Review

2024 marked a milestone for Bailey & Glasser, LLP as we celebrated 25 years since our founding on March 1, 1999. As founding partner Brian Glasser said back then, “I can’t tell you how great it is to come to work just plain excited.” For over 25 years, that passion has driven our dedication to practicing law while making a meaningful impact on our clients and communities—work that remains at the core of BG today.

This “2024 Year In Review” highlights our accomplishments from the past year, including work for our valued clients, introductions to new partners and lawyers, celebrations like our 25th anniversary celebration at our Washington, D.C. office, nationwide recognitions, and a flashback to 1999 from the BG Archives. Notable victories highlighted include a $40 million jury verdict in a Texas corporate fraud case, compassionate advocacy for abuse survivors and consumers injured by defective products, precedent-setting ERISA rulings on behalf of retirees in courts nationwide, a special section highlighting our litigation and corporate work in the energy industry, and over $1 billion in closed deals for the West Virginia Investment Management Board, and so much more.

Thank you for taking a few moments to explore this report—we hope you enjoy it. Follow this link to view the full report.

#BaileyGlasser #2024inReview #25thAnniversary #TrialLawyers #CorporateLawyers #ERISA #MassTorts #EnergyIndustry #Litigators #ClassActions #MassTorts #ProductLiability #Community

Bailey Glasser Secures $17 Million Settlement in False Claims Act Case Against C.R. Bard

After nearly seven years of relentless work, Bailey Glasser partners John Roddy, Elizabeth Ryan, and Brian McAllister, along with co-counsel Robert A. Griffith and federal prosecutors, secured a $17 million settlement to resolve False Claims Act allegations filed in 2017 by whistleblower Dirk Etheridge against C.R. Bard, Inc. and several of its affiliates. In United States, ex rel. Dirk Etheridge, et al. v. Liberator Medical Holdings, Inc., et al., No 1:17-cv-05187-LMM (N.D. Ga.), Mr. Etheridge alleged that the Bard entities offered free samples, discounts, and savings on in-office supplies to illegally induce urology practices across the country to prescribe Bard urological products.

This successful outcome is the product of thousands of hours of work by Mr. Etheridge’s legal team, which undertook extensive document review and legal analysis at the Government’s behest. On this score, Bailey Glasser’s ESI Practice Group, led by partner Katherine E. Charonko and including partner Tony Clackler coordinated the digital discovery and analysis efforts that were critical to ultimately reaching settlement.

To learn more about the BG team in this matter, please visit here.

#FalseClaimsAct #Whistleblower #BaileyGlasser

BG Wins Appeal in Dismissal of Negligence Lawsuit for Client APCo

A Bailey Glasser litigation team won an appeal before the Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia on behalf of our client Appalachian Power Company (“APCo”). The team in this case included partner and lead counsel Brian Swiger, partner and Civil Defense Practice Group Leader Rebecca Pomeroy, and lawyers Christopher Smith and Savanna Jones.

In this case, our client was accused of playing a role related to a motorcycle accident that occurred on Route 75 in West Virginia. After discovery concluded, our client won summary judgment because we proved, and the lower trial court correctly held, that APCo could not be liable for failing to maintain a driveway that it did not build, use, or own.

Indeed, all parties had admitted on appeal, that they had no evidence that APCo owned, maintained, used, or otherwise conducted any activities on the access road.

The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia agreed and found that the petitioners’ negligence claims failed as a matter of law.

Learn more about this matter and the BG Team, visit here.

#Energylaw #litigation #WestVirginia #Appeals #CivilDefense #BaileyGlasser

Kentucky’s SB 257 Ruled Unconstitutional in Interstate Commerce Victory

In the latest update in the years-long fight on behalf of Foresight Coal Sales, Bailey Glasser has secured another win for interstate commerce and constitutional law.

On September 24, 2024, the district court granted Foresight Coal Sales summary judgment, declaring Kentucky’s SB 257 unconstitutional and enjoining the Public Service Commission’s commissioners from enforcing the law. This ruling marks a significant victory in Foresight’s long-standing legal battle against a law the district court agreed discriminated against interstate commerce.

This triumph follows years of dedicated litigation led by Bailey Glasser attorneys Joshua Hammack, Nick Johnson, and Chris Smith, who have championed Foresight’s case from the outset. In February 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that Foresight’s constitutional claim was likely to succeed, delivering a key victory with a memorable opinion that Kentucky couldn’t “have its cake and eat it, too.”

Kentucky filed a petition for certiorari, arguing the Supreme Court of the United States should take up the case and reverse the Sixth Circuit’s decision. After the Supreme Court ordered Foresight to respond to that petition, Bailey Glasser’s team employed a creative and impactful argument, relying extensively on George Orwell’s Animal Farm to show the flaws in Kentucky’s case. In October 2023, the Supreme Court denied Kentucky’s petition, leaving the Sixth Circuit’s ruling intact and allowing the case to return to the district court.

This team of Bailey Glasser attorneys has been at the forefront of this fight, leading every phase of litigation—from the original complaint to discovery, appellate review, and now summary judgment. This latest decision is a testament to the team’s relentless pursuit of justice and constitutional fairness for Foresight. And this decision has far-reaching consequences for the coal industry, and for anyone selling across state lines, because it ensures states cannot extend or deny favorable treatment based on state of origin or similar “proxies” (e.g., state political decisions) that would threaten the unified national market.

Learn more about this case here:.

And for more information on our Commercial Litigation practice, please visit here.

Federal Court Approves Title IX Class Action Settlement With University of Central Oklahoma

Senior U.S. District Court Judge Joe Heaton approved a class action settlement yesterday that requires the University of Central Oklahoma (UCO) to provide female student-athletes with equal treatment and opportunities, hire an outside expert to conduct a review of its intercollegiate athletic program, and develop and implement a Gender Equity Plan to bring the entire program into compliance with Title IX.

Senior U.S. District Court Judge Joe Heaton approved a class action settlement yesterday that requires the University of Central Oklahoma (UCO) to provide female student-athletes with equal treatment and opportunities, hire an outside expert to conduct a review of its intercollegiate athletic program, and develop and implement a Gender Equity Plan to bring the entire program into compliance with Title IX. The settlement also provides UCO’s women’s varsity indoor track and field, outdoor track and field, and cross country teams with specific relief starting in 2024-25, including equipment, supplies, transportation, publicity, and practice schedules equal to those provided to men’s varsity teams; access to college-level practice facilities; and the ability to host at least one home competition every year. And it prohibits UCO from retaliating against any of its female student-athletes in violation of Title IX.

The settlement resolves a Title IX class action filed against UCO in 2022 by Tatum Robertson and Eve Brennan, two members of the women’s varsity track & field teams, for discriminating against its female student-athletes. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 is a federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination by any educational institution receiving federal funds.

The women’s indoor track & field, outdoor track & field, and cross-country teams at UCO—unlike any men’s teams—were provided no locker room, no competitive facility, and required to practice at a local middle school. When they complained about the unequal treatment they and other women athletes received, UCO fired their head coach.

“This lawsuit should not have been necessary,” said plaintiff and class representative Tatum Robertson. “We are delighted that UCO is finally going to stop discriminating against its women athletes and give them the equal treatment, benefits, and opportunities the law requires.”

“UCO has now agreed to everything we wanted from the start,” said plaintiff and class representative Eve Brennan. “That it took two years is particularly disturbing because Title IX has been the law for 52 years. But now UCO’s sex discrimination is going to stop.”

“We applaud the plaintiffs for fighting not only for themselves, but for all female student-athletes at UCO,” said plaintiffs’ counsel Lori Bullock of Bailey & Glasser, LLP. “We are honored to represent women who are willing to stand up to their universities and demand equality.”

To read more, click this link.

Bailey Glasser Defeats Motion to Dismiss in Schwab Managed 401(k) Action

BG secured an important win for employee participants of the Vituity and MedAmerica 401(k) retirement plan. On Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California ruled on a motion to dismiss filed by CEP America and the MedAmerica Retirement & Benefits Committee, which oversees the 401(k) plan offered to employees and retirees of Vituity and MedAmerica. In his ruling denying the motion in part, Judge Seeborg noted that the Complaint alleges that the fees charged by recordkeepers to other 401(k) plans “were multiples less than those charged” by Schwab.

The employees, represented by Greg Porter, BG’s ERISA Practice Group Leader, and ERISA partner Mark Boyko, allege that the Defendants violated ERISA laws by allowing millions of dollars of their retirement savings to go to Schwab’s recordkeeping arm and to MedAmerica. The Plaintiffs also alleged that Schwab’s excessive compensation included Schwab receiving benefits from the 401(k) Plan’s use of Schwab’s bank savings account.

“Employers need to understand and accept their responsibility for prudently managing 401(k) plans free from conflicts of interest and self-dealing,” Boyko said. “We look forward to pursuing this matter on its merits.”

The case is Nagy, et al., v. CEP America, LLC, et al, No. 23-cv-5648, and is pending in the Northern District of California.

BG’s award-winning ERISA, Employee Benefits & Trust Litigation practice has been ranked by Chambers & Partners in the Nationwide ERISA Litigation: Mainly Plaintiffs category. Learn more about our ERISA services here.

Greg Porter, BG’s ERISA Practice Group Leader, has also received top rankings by Chambers in Nationwide ERISA Litigation: Mainly Plaintiffs (Band One). Learn more about his practice here.

And for more on ERISA partner Mark Boyko, visit here.

#ERISA #401k #Retirement

Bailey Glasser Secures $3.6 Million Settlement in “Pay-to-Pay” Class Action Against Mr. Cooper

Bailey & Glasser, LLP secured a groundbreaking $3.6 million settlement in a class action before a federal district court in Washington, D.C on behalf of consumers who were charged illegal fees just for paying their mortgages over the phone. BG partner James Kauffman, along with attorneys from the law firm Tycko & Zavareei LLP are class counsel in this case.

The lawsuit against Mr. Cooper – formerly known as Nationstar Mortgage LLC – and one of the country’s largest home loan servicers, alleges that the servicer charged mortgage borrowers in D.C. and nationwide illegal “Pay-to-Pay” fees, or extra charges up to $14 to process each monthly payment by phone in violation of several federal and state consumer protection laws. The settlement, which obtained final approval on Thursday, included the nearly $3.6 million payment to 72,555 class members and was based on a novel legal argument under the D.C. “Protecting Consumers from Unjust Debt Collections Practices Act,” which provides additional statutory damages to consumers for each illegal transaction.

“The settlement obtained is an excellent result for the class, and we are pleased that the court agreed,” James Kauffman said. “While our work has caused many servicers to stop charging these fees, others persist in this abuse, and we will continue to fight to protect hardworking consumers from junk fees.”

You can learn more about this settlement by reading this Law360 article here.

To learn more about our “Pay-to-Pay” and Illegal Convenience Fee services, visit here.

#baileyglasser #classactions #paytopay #consumerprotection #illegalfees #mortgage

BG Wins Writ of Prohibition Before State of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals

A Bailey Glasser litigation team composed of founding partner Ben Bailey and lawyer Christopher Smith succeeded in obtaining a writ of prohibition from the State of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals on behalf of our client, Pachira Energy.

In this action for extraordinary relief, Pachira sought a writ of prohibition to prevent the Circuit Court of Monongalia County from a January 2023 order by that court which ordered disassociation of a partnership even though no party to the litigation sought disassociation in the underlying litigation. The underlying litigation involved the requested dissolution and winding up of a partnership under the West Virginia Revised Uniform Partnership Act. However, instead of ordering this dissolution, the circuit court disassociated Pachira from the partnership, effectively kicking it out of the partnership while allowing the partnership to continue operating.

In recognizing that “extraordinary remedies are reserved for ‘really extraordinary causes,’ the appellate court found for our client and determined that: “[a]fter a careful review of the parties’ arguments, the record before this Court and the applicable law, we conclude that the circuit court committed a clear legal error in ordering dissociation when that relief was not requested by either party. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition, vacate the order dissociating Pachira from the water system association, and remand this case to the circuit court for further proceedings.”

Obtaining relief of this nature is rare, but our litigators felt was warranted in this particular case. The case is now back before the Circuit Court for additional litigation. To read the Court’s Memorandum Decision, please visit here.

%d bloggers like this: